AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
1998 lincoln town car timing belt11/17/2023 While a timing chain will usually last far longer than a timing belt, it will suffer from wear and tear and will need replaced at some point during the life cycle of your 2004 Lincoln Town Car. With the timing chain taking over as the preferred option.Ī timing chain will need replaced far less frequently than a timing belt, resulting in a lower cost to maintain your 2004 Lincoln Town Car for the owner. Recently this trend has actually been in the opposite direction, Was usually more cost effective than using a timing chain, with the only cars opting for the chain being higher-end sports cars. Until recently, the vast majority of cars were built to use a timing belt instead of a timing chain. The chain keeps these valves opening and closing at specific intervals, helping the engine to function properly. The timing chain works as the connection between the camshaft and the crankshaft, and the main responsibility of the chain is to operate the inlet and exhaust valve gear during the stroke cycle of the piston. Prices will vary from state to state and from car to car, but they should give you a rough idea of what you can expect to pay. It is a tricky repair though, so unless you’re particularly skilled it’s usually best left to a mechanic.īelow are some sample costs for having the timing chain replaced at some of the leading garage chains in the country. Order the parts themselves for $ 88 and $ 245. For most cars,Ī timing chain replacement costs between $ 413 and $ 1040 Replacing the timing chain is a complicated job, and the labor costs can be quite high. It’s a more reliable solution which lasts longer, and although it can be a little more expensive upfront, it will be the cheaper and more reliable option over time. Has been preferred to a timing chain, manufacturers have made the switch to using timing chains in the past few years.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |